[jboss-user] [EJB 3.0] - Re: Is there an equivalent of @RemoteBindings in jboss.xml

[sbivol]

Ok, I just tried it on 4.0.5.GA. I have the following:

- a stateless bean with following remote bindings annotations:
@RemoteBindings({
    @RemoteBinding(clientBindUrl="sslsocket://0.0.0.0:3843", jndiBinding="TestService/remotessl"),
    @RemoteBinding(jndiBinding="TestService/remote")
})

- the ssl-service.xml and a keystore packaged within the ejb jar (exactly as shown in the SSL tuturial); the ejb-jar is packaged in an ear

- a service client that uses TestService/remotessl jndi name; it works; the clien console tells me it uses port 3843. If using TestService/remote; the client console tells me that that port 3873 (default Remote EJB3 Invoker port)

I then enable the Binding Service Manager in jboss-service.xml and point it to sample-bindings.xml file in the jboss/server/default/conf folder where the only thing I override is the port for the ssl invoker defined in the ssl-service.xml as follows:

  | <service-bindings>
  | 
  |    <server name="ports-default">
  | 
  |       <service-config name="jboss.remoting:type=Connector,transport=socket3843,handler=ejb3"
  |          delegateClass="org.jboss.services.binding.AttributeMappingDelegate">
  |         <delegate-config>
  |            <attribute name="InvokerLocator">sslsocket://${jboss.bind.address}:3833</attribute>
  |         </delegate-config>
  |          <binding port="3833"/>
  |       </service-config>
  |  
  |    </server>
  | 
  | </service-bindings>
  | 

If I run the ssl client now, I get a org.jboss.remoting.CannotConnectException, but the console tells me the client still tries to connect to 3843, as opposed to the override port 3833.

I suspect the service is now available over SSL at the new port, but client does not understand that it has to connect to that new port.

Would deploying the ssl-service.xml in the default/conf folder work?

Regards
Sergiu

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3983942#3983942

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3983942