[jbosstools-dev] Re: Strange versions in branches/jbosstools-2.0.x

[Max Rydahl Andersen]

On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:04:00 +0100, Marshall Culpepper <marshall.culpepper at redhat.com> wrote:

> Cool, haven't committed just yet.. wanted to make sure these changes
> sounded sane before doing so =).
>
> One last question -- org.jboss.ide.seam.gen is listed as 0.5.8, has that
> been changed at all since 2.0.0.GA ? (does it merit a version bump?)

It should get nuked. Is not relevant anymore.

-max

> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>> I ran through and changed all the versions in 2.0.x branch to 2.0.1, but
>>> wanted to note a few inconsistencies I saw when running through:
>>>
>>> - A number of plugins had their versions listed as 2.1.0 originally:
>>>     - jsf.vpe.ajax4jsf, jsf.vpe.facelets, jsf.vpe.richfaces,
>>> jsf.vpe.seam, jsf.vpe.tomahawk
>>>     - vpe, vpe.ui.palette, vpe.xulrunner (obsolete?)
>>>
>>
>> This was deliberate afaik because of the xulrunner funkyness to be sure to distinguish them.
>> AFAIK 2.0.0.GA had this 2.1.0 in them.
>>
>>
>>> I changed these back to 2.0.1 as I'm guessing they were changed in
>>> anticipation of the 2.1 release before being the branch was created.
>>>
>>
>> I think this is wrong. It should be rolled back. Sergey - can you verify_
>>
>>
>>> Also, I noticed that the o.j.t.hibernate.hblibs plugin is still using
>>> "old" Eclipse 3.0/2.1 style plugin.xml (with no MANIFEST.MF). Is there
>>> any reason for that?
>>>
>>
>> hblibs is exadel legacy stuff. Not included in the release. Should actually be moved.
>>
>>
>>> Max - What do you want the "base" version of Hibernate Tools to be for
>>> this release? 3.2.1 ?
>>>
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> -max
>>
>
>



-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/