[jbosstools-dev] Moving to XulRunner 1.9

Max Rydahl Andersen max.andersen at redhat.com
Mon Sep 7 18:23:06 EDT 2009


>>> 1.9
>>> and will not work with older versions.
>>> See here http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/atf-dev/msg00600.html
>>>
>>> Is it time for us to move on XR1.9?
>>>
>>>        
>> do we have a way to fix the missing features in XR1.9 ?
>> I recall last time that drag'n'drop and selection were affected ?
>>      
> DnD has been working normaly, as i remember.
> Selection has been affected only on
> OSX(https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368608) and workaround
> exists.
>    
What is that workaround ? I couldn't spot it in the comments.
>> What does ATF do ?
>>      
> What does it mean, is it about which functionality have atf?
>    
They also depend on similar features of xulrunner that we do - if they 
already fixed some thing we can reuse if
it makes sense or if they fixed it bad not how to do it.

Anyhow, I went back through the archives and found the following issues 
to be what we have discussed before:

1) The Selection area as described above. If that only affects Mac and 
there is a maintainable workaround that should be fine.

2) Platform availability - can we get or produce a xulrunner 1.9 binary 
for all our supported platforms ? x86_64 bit ? Mac Cocoa/Carbon ?

3) Updatability - will users (of both jboss tools and JBDS) be able to 
update to xulrunner 1.9 via our updatesite  without conflicts to the SWT 
integration/hook/hack ?

If we can solve/verify these or at least find acceptable workarounds and 
there isn't any other known problems then lets move to XulRunner 1.9 
after M3 have been released.

/max
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20090907/ba9de989/attachment.html 


More information about the jbosstools-dev mailing list