[jbosstools-dev] Example of the importance of getting proper headless fast and quick p2director installs up and running...

Max Rydahl Andersen max.andersen at redhat.com
Mon Sep 24 08:35:45 EDT 2012


>> ...or have a proper "minimal target" platform to build against. Take your pick.
>> 
>> 
>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-10287
>> 
>> 
>> A small innocent dependency and PDE annoying default behavior of putting in the very exact version used and suddenly you can't install plugins into SR0.
>> 
>> Our automating tests should help catch these.
>> 
> It does: http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-4.0_trunk.install-tests-e4.2-jbt_trunk/352/testReport/org.jboss.tools.tests.installation/InstallTest/testInstall/

link seem to be dead, http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-4.0_trunk.install-tests-e4.2-jbt_trunk/357/  is better

so thats cool but there are a few problems here:

1) I can see the build is red - but no info about what failed.
   (I found it after doing ~7 clicks to reach http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-4.0_trunk.install-tests-e4.2-jbt_trunk/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/org.jboss.tools.tests.installation/InstallTest/testInstall/ which is actually pretty precise)

2) how do i run this test before I commit to trunk so i can see if my changes affected 

...apparently the build is using later versions since otherwise this should have failed in build.

Thus as a minimum this build job should be one of those sent to jbosstools-dev IMO. That would make everyone aware something is wrong in dependencies. wdyt?

> and https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-10287

Yes? this is the jira I pointed to - didn't 


/max


More information about the jbosstools-dev mailing list