[jbosstools-dev] Review upcoming change to 4.30.5.Alpha6-SNAPSHOT target platform

Mickael Istria mistria at redhat.com
Tue Jun 4 17:56:52 EDT 2013


On 06/04/2013 11:33 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> Await approvals from build, affected team leads and project lead(s). 
> In case of urgency build + one project lead is considered ok, but 
> should be the exception.
Updates of Eclipse version are specifically affecting no-one, and I fear 
it's not about to get much feedback. It's a low-risk change and the 
later we apply it, the later we'll know whether everything works fine 
with newer TP.
A too long feedback loop (several days) is not very possible in the RC 
stream with a new release of Eclipse release train every week.

> To give feedback the changes looks good on first roll but change from 
> planner to slicing (which I normally would consider good)
> should be confirmed first. i.e. what dependencies will *not* be 
> included now ?
> These could easily escape being detected in builds thus would be great 
> to outline them in such a change.
> Have you compared the list of bundles in generated TP with and without 
> this slicing/planner mode ?
It won't affect builds.
The mirror-target-to-repo mojo is actually a "slicer", so the output 
site for target-platform does not depend on planner/slicer, it's always 
the same output as slicer. So moving TP from planner to slicer in 
multiple makes it easier/faster to detect mistakes that used to occur 
only while validation unified target. Those issues are now detected 
while validating multiple (about 1 hour earlier).

-- 
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets 
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20130604/9d80854f/attachment.html 


More information about the jbosstools-dev mailing list