[jbosstools-dev] Fixing in both 4.3.x and master

[Nick Boldt]

+1: 9.0.1.* issues move/rename to 9.1.0.Beta1 (Xmas), with 9.1.0.GA in March.

---

If we decide we need a 9.0.1 release in November, here's how that will
align JBT/JBDS:

* 4.3.1.Final as input to 9.0.1.GA,
* 4.3.2.Beta1 as input to 9.1.0.Beta1, and
* 4.3.2.Final as input to 9.1.0.GA.

So it's doable, but would result in having to backlevel JBDS from its
current 9.1.0 versioning.

Is this a likely scenario? Should I call what's in 4.3.x branch
9.0.1.CR1 instead of 9.1.0?

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Alexey Kazakov <alkazako at redhat.com> wrote:
> 9.1.0 is something we would want to release for Mars.2 (February/March
> 2016).
> 9.0.1 is something we could release earlier if we find critical issues in
> 9.0.0.GA
> But according to Max's statistic report users don't care much if we call our
> builds Alphas/Betas/CRs or GA/Final. It means it doesn't make much sense to
> release 9.0.1.Final close to 9.1.0.Beta.
>
> So, my proposal would be:
> 1. Plan to release 9.1.0.Beta1 in Xmas and 9.1.0.GA around Eclipse Mars.2
> (February/March 2016)
> 2. If we find any critical issue in 9.0.0.GA we want to fix earlier we could
> release 9.0.1 in November.
>
> If it's OK I would move all current 9.0.1 issues to 9.1.0.Beta1. And remove
> 9.0.1 not to confuse devs and QE. If we have any critical issues and we see
> that we need release 9.0.1 then we will create this version in JIRA.
>
> WDYT?
>
>
> On 10/14/2015 03:06 PM, Fred Bricon wrote:
>
> Can we rename 9.0.1.Beta1 to 9.1.0.Beta1 in JIRA, if need be?
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Alexey Kazakov <alkazako at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> 4.3.1.Beta1 yes.
>> 9.0.1.Beta1 probably yes too, but not sure we will release 9.0.1. It's
>> possible that we will release 9.1.0 Only. Anyway 9.1.0 will use 4.3.x branch
>> so, we can have both 9.0.1.Beta1 and 9.1.0.Beta1 and if we don't release
>> 9.0.1 we will move all 9.0.1 issues to 9.1.0.
>>
>>
>> On 10/14/2015 02:22 PM, Denis Golovin wrote:
>>
>> Should we create specific development versions for 4.3.x/9.0.x streams in
>> JIRA?
>> Something like:
>> - 4.3.1.Beta1
>> - 9.0.1.Beta1
>>
>> Then we can use it in fixed issues.
>>
>> Currently I see only 4.3.1.Final and 9.0.1.GA are available.
>>
>> Denis
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Alexey Kazakov <alkazako at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Please make sure when you are fixing anything in both 4.3.x and master
>>> branches, create a separate issue for every stream. So we will have two
>>> JIRAs (the original one + a clone), one for 4.4.0 and the second one for
>>> 4.3.0.
>>> It will help QE to verify the issue is fixed in both streams. Remember
>>> we have different cycles for maintenance and main releases.
>>> It's OK to have multiple fix versions in one JIRA while you are working
>>> on it. It's NOT OK to resolve an issue with the only fix version and w/o
>>> a clone while applying a PR to both streams!
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and files attached to it are
>>> confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby
>>> notified
>>> that using, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the
>>> contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received
>>> this email in error please notify the sender and delete this email.
>>
>>
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and files attached to it are
>> confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified
>> that using, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the
>> contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received
>> this email in error please notify the sender and delete this email.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev



-- 
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com