[jbosstools-dev] Known issues w/ JBT 4.4.0.Alpha1 & DS 10.0.0.Alpha1 bits staged for QE

[Max Rydahl Andersen]

On 2 May 2016, at 22:11, Nick Boldt wrote:

> In case you're not sure what the "de.config" file is, I think Max 
> means this:
>
> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/configuration/ide-config.properties
>
> #notAGermanLanguageTranslationFile

damn sticky "i" key. I meant to write ide.config :)

/max

>
> :D
>
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen
> <manderse at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 2 May 2016, at 18:00, Paul Leacu wrote:
>>
>>>    Hey -
>>>        I've been building a local JBTIS TP based on Neon.  We have a
>>> chicken-and-egg issue
>>>    with IS dependency on JBT core.  Now that we've got a staging 
>>> version I
>>> should have an
>>>    Alpha1 JBTIS TP released this week.
>>
>>
>> great - so coordinate with Nick when to make sense to enable it 
>> again. The
>> nice things about the de.config file is that it is trivial to turn 
>> on/off.
>>
>> /max
>>
>>
>>>                 --paull
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>
>>>> From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <manderse at redhat.com>
>>>> To: "Nick Boldt" <nboldt at redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> Sent: Monday, May 2, 2016 3:55:58 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [jbosstools-dev] Known issues w/ JBT 4.4.0.Alpha1 & DS
>>>> 10.0.0.Alpha1 bits staged for QE
>>>>
>>>> On 2 May 2016, at 2:43, Nick Boldt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I could remove it from the ide-config.properties, sure, but in the
>>>>> absence of instructions from Paul, Alexey, or yourself, I just 
>>>>> assumed
>>>>> we'd use the current staged IS bits for Mars in the current JBT/DS
>>>>> staged bits for Neon.
>>>>> And in doing so, something went awry, as
>>>>> reported in the above JIRAs.
>>>>>
>>>>> We don't have a clear policy for what to do when starting the 
>>>>> Alphas
>>>>> for a new JBT/DS when there are no IS bits available. We should
>>>>> probably write one.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The clear policy we have is to not mix up Eclipse release train TP 
>>>> sites
>>>> (unless properly vetted and tested for sanity).
>>>>
>>>> Been the same for years IMO.
>>>>
>>>> So if you are waiting for me to say something: If integration stack
>>>> cannot be installed
>>>> into Neon without problems - please remove Integration Stack
>>>> setup for Neon until IS itself can provide a working solution or 
>>>> judge
>>>> if the problem is tolerable.
>>>> Do please notify Paul about the change in a jira and mail so he 
>>>> knows
>>>> about it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> /max
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 5:51 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen
>>>>> <manderse at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So for now, JBTIS content can't be installed into JBT 
>>>>>>> 4.4.0.Alpha1,
>>>>>>> but that's OK because anything we'd be installing is the 
>>>>>>> Mars-based
>>>>>>> stuff, not the Neon-based stuff.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not following the logic in that statement. Installing mars based 
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> what we
>>>>>> would
>>>>>> expect at this time since no Neon available, but we shouldn't be
>>>>>> pointing to
>>>>>> something
>>>>>> that adds a Eclipse Mars based TP. Why is IS not just removed 
>>>>>> from
>>>>>> our Neon
>>>>>> metadata
>>>>>> until it has working setup so we avoid adding Mars update sites ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /max
>>>>>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
>>>>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
>>>>> http://nick.divbyzero.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> /max
>>>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>
>>
>>
>> /max
>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>
>
>
> -- 
> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
> http://nick.divbyzero.com


/max
http://about.me/maxandersen