[jbpm-dev] [Design of JBoss jBPM] - super-state, scope or something else
tom.baeyens@jboss.com
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Fri May 15 05:14:03 EDT 2009
hi guys,
i'm starting on the super-state. and i'm in doubt if we should keep the name super-state.
the only alternative name i can come up with is scope. i like that a bit better. but we also kept 'state' because it would be easier for people that know jbpm 3, even though 'wait' would have been better. so i think the same applies here and hence we should keep super-state
but i just wanted to check if there are other opinions out there.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231244#4231244
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4231244
More information about the jbpm-dev
mailing list