[jbpm-dev] Eventual integration with OverLord -- anyone interested?

[Mauricio Salatino]

Hmm..
I'm not sure what overlord is exactly, but that looks extremely technical.
BAM is about Business and usually roles like Business Managers are
interested in such information, and I don't see them so interested in
MBeans or JVM information.

I understand why the overlord guys are using the BAM acronym, but I think
that we can achieve similar things with panels in UberFire where both
Drools and jBPM are spending time. What I think it can be useful is to
define a set of requirements for a "BAM console" which involves Drools and
jBPM events to start coding some panels in UB.

My two cents


On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Marco Rietveld <mrietvel at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> I'm not sure if anyone's already written about this:
>
>
> http://jboss-overlord.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/introducing-overlord-bam-and-gadget.html
>
> Integrating jbpm-bam with the overlord activity server seems like a good
> match: if you have extra time and are interested, go for it!
>
>
> Thanks,
> Marco
>
> --
> jBPM/Drools developer
> Utrecht, the Netherlands
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbpm-dev mailing list
> jbpm-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbpm-dev
>



-- 
 - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
 - Co-Founder @ http://www.jugargentina.org
 - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar

 - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbpm-dev/attachments/20120817/25862c3e/attachment.html