[jbpm-users] modify running processes
Abid Hussain
abid.hussain at abid76.de
Mon Feb 23 07:07:18 EST 2009
Anybody out there? In my question I just wonder how the change of demands on
already defined and running processes can be handled.
Maybe this is a stupid question but in our business scenario it is very unlikely
to foresee all eventualities which can come up during a process execution and
therefore it is important to somehow be able to react on changed demands.
On the other hand it is a definite requirement that the process execution can be
controlled/observed by a software environment.
Or is it in this kind of scenario not recommended to use a process
definition/execution environment?
Regards,
Abid
Abid Hussain schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> I've a question about what happens to already instantiated and running
> processes when the underlying process definition is modified (using jbpm
> 3.2).
>
> Or, let's say it the other way round: is it possible to modify the
> process definition of running processes at runtime and let them somehow
> "migrate" to the new process definition?
>
> This may sound a little strange. But it is a requirement of our business
> scenario that a process definition can be changed at runtime, when it
> becomes obvious in the daily work that the current definition doesn't
> fulfill all needs in our business anymore.
>
> Would be happy if someone could provide me with some feedback!
>
> Regards,
>
> Abid
>
--
Abid Hussain
Mail: abid.hussain at abid76.de
Web: http://www.abid76.de
More information about the jbpm-users
mailing list