[jsfunit-dev] patched cactus and ant example application

[Stan Silvert]

The JSFUnitFilter is now committed.  All the unit tests pass on all four 
platforms.  The web.xml changes that you will need can be seen in 
jsfunit-examples\hellojsf\hellojsf-jsfunit\src\main\webapp\WEB-INF\web.xml

I'll update the doco and the web site a bit later.  Also, I'll be 
removing JSFUnitServlet and JSFUnitCactusRedirector.

Stan

Stan Silvert wrote:
> OK.  I'll get the filter implemented ASAP.  I should be able to finish 
> it over the weekend.
> 
> Matt Wringe wrote:
>> On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 16:25 -0400, Stan Silvert wrote:
>>> Matt Wringe wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have the patched cactus ant jars and have also created an ant build
>>>> file that takes the hellojsf webapp and adds the jsfunit bits [I also
>>>> have a very small doc about how to use the ant with jsfunit].
>>>>
>>> Great.  Will we still need a patch if we change to a Filter solution 
>>> as I just described here?
>>> http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4046925#4046925
>> If we use the filter approach I don't think we will need any patches.
>>
>>>> I have a couple of questions:
>>>> 1) where should the patched cactus jars go?
>>> If we need a patch for cactify I'll push a binary to the web site for 
>>> download.  But we won't check it into the main project unless the 
>>> Cactus team refuses to do a release.
>>>
>>>> 2) I would like to get the ant example into svn, but I am a bit unsure
>>>> about a couple of things. Would it be ok to set it up like other ant
>>>> projects and put its dependency jars into svn? Or to set it up to use
>>>> the Maven tasks for ant so that dependencies and such come from the
>>>> maven repo? I currently have it setup as a bit of both (it grabs 
>>>> some of
>>>> the jars from the repo, but it won't download them if they are not in
>>>> the repo).
>>> Yes, we definitely want your ant example in the main project.  I'd 
>>> rather not have any dependent jars in SVN if we can help it.  I don't 
>>> think it adds any value to show developers how to set that part up.
>>>
>>> So I would prefer using the Maven tasks for ant to make dependencies 
>>> come from the mave repo.
>> Yeah, I like that idea better, I never really liked the idea of having
>> jars in version control.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Matt Wringe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jsfunit-dev mailing list
>>>> jsfunit-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jsfunit-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jsfunit-dev mailing list
> jsfunit-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jsfunit-dev