[jsr-314-open] [jsf2.next] <h:head> vs. <head>

Tue Dec 15 15:04:19 EST 2009

I'd even like to see it add <head> if not provided. Would that be too
overreaching?

Lincoln Baxter III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
Keep it simple.

On Dec 15, 2009 1:02 PM, "David Geary" <clarity.training at gmail.com> wrote:

2009/12/15 Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter at gmail.com>

> > It would be nice if it "just worked", and jsf would automatically
add/detect he right place to l...
+1. I always pitch h:head and h:body as necessary to coordinate with
resource relocation from h:outputScript and h:outputStylesheet, but it would
be great if you could just use <head> and <body> instead, and have
everything work.

david

> > Lincoln Baxter III > http://ocpsoft.com > http://scrumshark.com > Keep
it simple. >> >> On Dec 1...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20091215/a051eaa3/attachment.html 