[jsr-314-open] [jsf2.next] <h:head> vs. <head>

Tue Dec 15 16:26:53 EST 2009

Could someone please file this as a spec RFE?

We'll have to do a performance test to really see the implications, but 
it does seem like it would be useful to have this.

Jim

On 12/15/09 12:04 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
> I'd even like to see it add <head> if not provided. Would that be too
> overreaching?
>
> Lincoln Baxter III
> http://ocpsoft.com
> http://scrumshark.com
> Keep it simple.
>
>> On Dec 15, 2009 1:02 PM, "David Geary" <clarity.training at gmail.com
>> <mailto:clarity.training at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> 2009/12/15 Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter at gmail.com
>> <mailto:lincolnbaxter at gmail.com>>
>>
>> > > It would be nice if it "just worked", and jsf would automatically
>> add/detect he right place to l...
>>
>> +1. I always pitch h:head and h:body as necessary to coordinate with
>> resource relocation from h:outputScript and h:outputStylesheet, but it
>> would be great if you could just use <head> and <body> instead, and
>> have everything work.
>>
>>
>> david
>>
>> > > Lincoln Baxter III > http://ocpsoft.com > http://scrumshark.com >
>> Keep it simple. >> >> On Dec 1...
>>
>>