[jsr-314-open] JSF2 bashing on TSS

[Kito Mann]

You know, that wasn't nearly as bad as I thought. I found the Spring vs Java
EE thread pretty fascinating, actually. I'll have to tell Reza that :-).

I added a small post, but honestly, I felt like JSF 2 was represented pretty
well, and not just by us.
---
Kito D. Mann | twitter: kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
Virtua, Inc. | http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE training and consulting
http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info | twitter:
jsfcentral
+1 203-404-4848 x3

Sign up for the JSFCentral newsletter: http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17



On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:47 PM, David Geary <clarity.training at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I just posted something as well. I think it's important that we publicly
>> acknowledge that JSF 1 left a lot to be desired, but that we are working
>> hard to fix that in JSF 2. I also think it's important that we let people
>> know we are listening, and that we seriously consider what they say, even if
>> they may be somewhat belligerent. I also added a link to
>> www.javaserverfaces.org in my reply.
>>
>
> Great post. Some posts need no response because there would be nothing more
> to add or take away. I think your post falls in that category ;)
>
> -Dan
>
> --
> Dan Allen
> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
> Registered Linux User #231597
>
> http://mojavelinux.com
> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20091215/c9d60ddb/attachment.html