[jsr-314-open] JSF2 bashing on TSS

[David Geary]

2009/12/15 Kito Mann <kito.mann at virtua.com>

> You know, that wasn't nearly as bad as I thought. I found the Spring vs
> Java EE thread pretty fascinating, actually. I'll have to tell Reza that
> :-).
>
> I added a small post, but honestly, I felt like JSF 2 was represented
> pretty well, and not just by us.
>

Yup, agreed. Quite a few folks were quick to defend JSF 2, and highlight how
cool it is. Yet another verification that we're on the right track. Feels
good.


david


> ---
> Kito D. Mann | twitter: kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
> Virtua, Inc. | http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE training and consulting
> http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info |
> twitter: jsfcentral
> +1 203-404-4848 x3
>
> Sign up for the JSFCentral newsletter: http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:47 PM, David Geary <clarity.training at gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> I just posted something as well. I think it's important that we publicly
>>> acknowledge that JSF 1 left a lot to be desired, but that we are working
>>> hard to fix that in JSF 2. I also think it's important that we let people
>>> know we are listening, and that we seriously consider what they say, even if
>>> they may be somewhat belligerent. I also added a link to
>>> www.javaserverfaces.org in my reply.
>>>
>>
>> Great post. Some posts need no response because there would be nothing
>> more to add or take away. I think your post falls in that category ;)
>>
>> -Dan
>>
>> --
>> Dan Allen
>> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
>> Registered Linux User #231597
>>
>> http://mojavelinux.com
>> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20091216/185c08e7/attachment.html