[jsr-314-open] getting behind CDI

[Dan Allen]

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for posting this Dan. Its been on my to do list, but as usual,
> you've summed up the points thoroughly and clearly. I am 100% on board with
> acknowledging / deprecating the jsf built-in managed bean facility in favor
> of a platform feature. IMO, jsf is crippled without a full DI container.
>
Right. And the nice, neutral message for JSF 2 is "For your programming
model, use CDI (platform managed beans) or provide your own alternative bean
container, such as Spring. We are in the business of creating a UI component
model."

-Dan

-- 
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20091217/1ab8c0b7/attachment.html