[jsr-314-open] getting behind CDI

[Lincoln Baxter, III]

Thanks for posting this Dan. Its been on my to do list, but as usual, you've
summed up the points thoroughly and clearly. I am 100% on board with
acknowledging / deprecating the jsf built-in managed bean facility in favor
of a platform feature. IMO, jsf is crippled without a full DI container.

+1

Lincoln Baxter III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
Keep it simple.

On Dec 17, 2009 11:39 AM, "Dan Allen" <dan.j.allen at gmail.com> wrote:


> > Isn't it easier just to get started with JSF 2 along?
                                                                  ^ alone

-- Dan Allen Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #2...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20091217/c7d0569d/attachment.html