[jsr-314-open] getting behind CDI

[Martin Marinschek]

Hi guys,

I agree. Use a full-blown DI container to get the job done. The
managed bean facility will just not be enough for all your needs.

However, what DI container you do, remains your thing - and that's
also why I am not sure we should try enforcing using CDI in all
examples which are written with JSF 2 ;)

regards,

Martin

On 12/17/09, Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:
> It made it, welcome!
>
> Lincoln Baxter III
> http://ocpsoft.com
> http://scrumshark.com
> Keep it simple.
>
> On Dec 17, 2009 12:28 PM, "Matthias Wessendorf" <
> matthias.wessendorf at oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Dan Allen wrote:
>
>> > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
> lincolnbaxter at gmail.com <mailto:lincolnb...
> +1 on that sentence;
>
> (Note that I am not sure if the mail will get through, but sometimes I feel
> to comment on an email ... ;-) )
>
>> > -Dan > > -- > Dan Allen > Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of
> Seam in Action > Regi...
>


-- 

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces