[jsr-314-open] [ADMIN] Final Draft Release Candidate 1

[Kito Mann]

Hello Ed,

I think you and Roger have done a wonderful job putting this all together,
especially with all of the different artifacts. A few comments:

PLD Docs

* Since we've decided to call it the VDL, why are these still called
PDLDocs?
* The <composite:attribute> "method-signature" should probably be renamed
"methodSignature" to be more consistent with the other attributes

PDF

Whole document -- "page description language" is still used in a few places
-- a Search and Replace needs to be performed, and this will create some
minor changes for the RI  (for example, the configuration in 11.4.5)

* Section 3.6.1.6, formatting is messed up
* Section 5.6.1, p 5-15: "resource" is spelled incorrectly when describing
getValue()
* Section 5.6.2 doesn't mention "flash" as an implicit variable, and I don't
see any other reference to how it is resolved in the PDF. The JavaDocs for
Flash say its an implicit variable called "flash".  In addition, I would
expect "flash" to be "flashScope" like the other scope (even though it has
special semantics). And why is flash a property of the ExternalContext
instead of the FacesContext?
* Section 13.1.1.1 -- As I've mentioned several times, it's silly for us not
to have a simple @AjaxResource annotation that encapsulates the standard
librarry name and its location. Every component developer is going to have
to do this themselves.
* Section 13.1.1.3 -- Same issue as 13.1.1.1 -- should be a
<h:outputAjaxScript/> element
* Section 13.1.1.3 -- Should say "The View Declaration Language Approach"

---
Kito D. Mann -- Author, JavaServer Faces in Action
http://twitter.com/kito99  http://twitter.com/jsfcentral
http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training, and mentoring
http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info
+1 203-404-4848 x3


On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Ed Burns <Ed.Burns at sun.com> wrote:

> Hello Team,
>
> The first release candidate for the Final Draft of the JSF 2.0 spec is
> available for your review at [1].  I expect we'll have one more revision
> of this to incorporate yesterday's last minute Ajax changes.  Please,
> editorial bug fixes only at this point.
>
> I plan to hand the final JSF 2.0 Spec, RI, and TCK to the JCP on
> Wednesday morning.
>
> So close I can taste it!
>
> Ed
>
> [1]
> https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/files/documents/1936/133830/jsf-spec-2.0-20090505.zip
> --
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20090505/e826e606/attachment.html