[jsr-314-open] sendAjaxRequest is not defined?

[Alexander Smirnov]

Behavior tag always throws exception in attempt to bind for unregistered
event, so <f:ajax event="onclick" > will cause an error.

Martin Marinschek wrote:
> If we disallow the on...-syntax, we need to throw an exception if
> someone provides us with an on...-value for the attribute - this is
> the least we can do for our users!
> 
> regards,
> 
> Martin
> 
> On 5/27/09, Roger Kitain <Roger.Kitain at sun.com> wrote:
>> I thought one of the reasons was that the "event" f:ajax attribute also
>> supports "valueChange" (for example) which is not a DOM event ..
>> I suppose we could change the docs to say that this attribute supports
>> the standard DOM events in addition to the faces events
>> "valueChange" (for EditableValueHolders) and "action" (for ActionSource)...
>>
>> -roger
>>
>> Andy Schwartz wrote:
>>> Dan Allen wrote:
>>>> Anyone else on the EG have any thoughts about supporting both
>>>> derivations today?
>>> I do, since I was the one who pushed for the current solution.  :-)
>>>
>>> Will follow up with my thinking as soon as I get some free cycles here.
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>>> -Dan
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dan Allen
>>>> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
>>>>
>>>> http://mojavelinux.com
>>>> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>>>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan
>>>>
>>>> NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily
>>>> basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away
>>>> from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more than a
>>>> week,
>>>> it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was
>>>> caught in the spam filters.  Please don't hesitate to resend a
>>>> message if
>>>> you feel that it did not reach my attention.
>>
> 
>