[jsr-314-open] FacesServlet declaration in Java EE 6

Dan Allen dan.j.allen at gmail.com
Thu Nov 5 13:16:45 EST 2009


Now that I think more about it, there really is no harm, and plenty of
benefits, in having both mapped, so +1 to both.

-Dan

p.s. In a way it's like having .jsp and .jspx mapped in JspServlet.

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Kito Mann <kito.mann at virtua.com> wrote:

>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:19 PM, David Geary <clarity.training at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> +1 from me as well, but shouldn't "should" be "must"?
>>
>
> +1 for me for both mappings, and I agree with David -- "must" is preferred.
>
>
>>
>> 2009/11/4 Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> "If the JSF container is used in a Servlet 3 (or newer) environment, it
>>>> should register an implementation of ServletContainerInitializer (using
>>>> Service Providers from the JAR file specification). The
>>>> ServletContainerInitializer should register the FacesServlet, with a name of
>>>> Faces Servlet, if an existing servlet is not yet registered with this name.
>>>> Furthermore, a suffix mapping of *.jsf [and/or a prefix mapping of /faces/*]
>>>> should be added."
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well said. +1 from me.
>>>
>>> -Dan
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dan Allen
>>> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
>>> Registered Linux User #231597
>>>
>>> http://mojavelinux.com
>>> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>>> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20091105/a360dd94/attachment.html 


More information about the jsr-314-open-mirror mailing list