[jsr-314-open] [jsf2next] PROJECT_STAGE system property configuration

[Dan Allen]

On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Cay Horstmann <cay at horstmann.com> wrote:

> On 01/07/2010 03:43 AM, Pete Muir wrote:
>
>  I like the idea of a container-wide setting - it fits with how people
>> use container instances (people rarely use the same server for
>> development and production).
>>
>> It would also be great to get this pushed into the EE platform - I
>> know that this has been suggested by the 314 EG, but when I speak to
>> the EE guys, they also seem keen on this idea...
>>
>>
> Absolutely. This is something that I have requested for years. An app
> server is a development platform, not just a deployment platform.
>
>
We need to make sure this request makes it out of the mailinglist and in
front of the Java EE spec leads. Is there a formal way for one spec to
propose and enhancement to another spec, other than submitting a JSR? We
want to propose it in such a way that they understand that all of us that
support it are pushing/voting for it.

-Dan

-- 
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20100107/82c2b014/attachment.html