[jsr-314-open] MethodRule API

[Cagatay Civici]

Agreed as well, otherwise every library(Trinidad, PrimeFaces ...) needs to come up with it's own implementation which is the quick dirty workaround at the moment.

On Jan 29, 2010, at 7:32 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com> wrote:
>> This class is one of the prime candidates supporting the request to
>> reevaluate the decision as to which Facelets APIs would be made public. This
>> particular class has it's own spec issue, which at the moment is
>> unscheduled.
>> 
>> https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=595
>> 
>> Since this is a very commonly needed class, I recommend that it is promoted
>> as part of the 2.0 rev a release.
> 
> I totally agree!
> 
>> 
>> -Dan
>> 
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Cagatay Civici <cagatay.civici at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> When testing Apache MyFaces 2 with PrimeFaces2, I've realized that
>>> Facelets method rule api is implementation specific,
>>> 
>>> so with mojarra it is com.sun.faces.facelets.tag.MethodRule
>>> and with myfaces it is org.apache.myfaces.facelets.tag.MethodRule
>>> 
>>> Is there any specific reason why it hasn't been moved to standard API eg
>>> javax.faces.facelets.tag.MethodRule?
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Cagatay Civici
>>> JSF EG | PrimeFaces Lead | Apache MyFaces PMC
>>> http://www.primefaces.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Dan Allen
>> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
>> Registered Linux User #231597
>> 
>> http://mojavelinux.com
>> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf