[keycloak-dev] travis seems to be down

Tue Aug 23 03:04:44 EDT 2016

+1 To tune, but my machine still runs everything in 30min while Travis
takes more than an hour, so having a beefy machine would make a big
difference.

BTW remembered the issue with the cache. The cache is downloaded from S3
which takes time, but then if anything changes in it, it's also uploaded
again. Most of the time it is uploaded again due to the lastUpdated files
changing as Maven rechecks the dependencies. This is caused by Maven
checking dependencies (daily I think). It can be changed in settings.xml,
but not through a CLI option AFAIK. This downloading/uploading takes almost
as much time as downloading deps from Maven central.

On 22 August 2016 at 18:19, Marek Posolda <mposolda at redhat.com> wrote:

> This looks better then my workaround of having long bash command to log
> "something" every 10 seconds. That worked fine as well, but didn't really
> look pretty :-)
>
> BTV. instead of looking at another alternative for Travis, we can maybe
> spend the time to tune our testsuite? We have already JIRA for it
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-3123 .
>
> The advantage is, that it will help with the speed of build on our laptops
> too, not just with the speed of CI. I've personally ended to always run the
> build with "-DskipTests=true" on my laptop as it takes forever to build
> with tests.
>
> Marek
>
>
> On 17/08/16 08:46, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>
> I've tweaked the stroppy toddler a bit (
> <https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/3147>
> https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/3147). Ran that PR 5 times and
> it passed every time, so hopefully it'll make it a bit more stable. Still
> takes more than 1 hour to complete though.
>
> On 16 August 2016 at 16:06, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:
>
>> There are some alternatives that we could try:
>>
>> * https://www.cloudbees.com/partners/platform/red-hat
>> * https://developers.openshift.com/managing-your-applications/
>> continuous-integration.html
>> * Make use of a beefy machine :)
>> * Or host Jenkins in some paid cloud infrastructure
>>
>> If we don't have any volunteers, count me in.
>>
>> On 2016-08-15, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>> > My opinion is that i HATE Travis! It's slow and has a tendency to act
>> like
>> > a stroppy toddler.
>> >
>> > Removing -q doesn't work because we then end up generating more log than
>> > Travis allows which kills the build as well.
>> >
>> > We used to have the caching enabled, but it used to result in a lot of
>> > issues. Can't quite remember the details though. Maybe we can try it
>> again.
>> >
>> > There's also travis_wait option that could work (
>> > https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/common-build-problems/#Build
>> -times-out-because-no-output-was-received
>> > ).
>> >
>> > My preference would be to migrate away from Travis and use something
>> more
>> > beefy that can run tests quicker.
>> >
>> > I'll need to figure out someone to look into it though. Any volunteers?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 28 July 2016 at 17:11, Pedro Igor Silva < <psilva at redhat.com>
>> psilva at redhat.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Let's see what Stian thinks about it :) For me, it is also an option.
>> > >
>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > From: "Bruno Oliveira" < <bruno at abstractj.org>bruno at abstractj.org>
>> > > To: "Pedro Igor Silva" < <psilva at redhat.com>psilva at redhat.com>
>> > > Cc: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>, "keycloak-dev" <
>> > > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 10:45:35 PM
>> > > Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] travis seems to be down
>> > >
>> > > Another alternative, but you might not enjoy it, is :)
>> > >
>> > > Before start building Keycloak, pre-download all the '.m2' dir with
>> > > the dependencies required. Second alternative, is to try some
>> caching[1],
>> > > but it may
>> > > or may not work.
>> > >
>> > > [1] - https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/caching/
>> > >
>> > > On 2016-07-27, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
>> > > > As Bruno suggested, the problem is probably related with the build
>> > > taking too long. If you look at the first command being executed:
>> > > >
>> > > >     mvn install -Pdistribution -DskipTests=true -B -V -q
>> > > >
>> > > > The -q option tells maven to run in quite mode and only show errors.
>> > > Even in my laptop, if I run the command above it takes a bit more
>> time to
>> > > show any output (not too long, but more than usual). That may explain
>> that
>> > > message from Travis.
>> > > >
>> > > > Maybe we should remove -q and just log everything. That could make
>> the
>> > > builds more stable.
>> > > >
>> > > > I've forced a new build to your <https://github.com/keycloak/>
>> https://github.com/keycloak/
>> > > keycloak/pull/3079 (without changing anything to .travis.yml). Now it
>> is
>> > > running.
>> > > >
>> > > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > > From: "Bill Burke" < <bburke at redhat.com>bburke at redhat.com>
>> > > > To: "Pedro Igor Silva" < <psilva at redhat.com>psilva at redhat.com>,
>> "Bruno Oliveira" <
>> > > bruno at abstractj.org>
>> > > > Cc: "keycloak-dev" < <keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 8:53:16 PM
>> > > > Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] travis seems to be down
>> > > >
>> > > > Wrong... :(  I still get this problem.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On 7/27/16 7:02 PM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
>> > > > > I think Travis decided to not mess with Bill :)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > > > From: "Bruno Oliveira" < <bruno at abstractj.org>bruno at abstractj.org
>> >
>> > > > > To: "Pedro Igor Silva" < <psilva at redhat.com>psilva at redhat.com>
>> > > > > Cc: "Bill Burke" < <bburke at redhat.com>bburke at redhat.com>,
>> "keycloak-dev" <
>> > > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 6:37:44 PM
>> > > > > Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] travis seems to be down
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Seems like the balance of the Force was established again.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 2016-07-27, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
>> > > > >> Got that error, but now the build was successful.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> ----- Original Message -----
>> > > > >> From: "Bruno Oliveira" < <bruno at abstractj.org>
>> bruno at abstractj.org>
>> > > > >> To: "Bill Burke" < <bburke at redhat.com>bburke at redhat.com>
>> > > > >> Cc: "keycloak-dev" < <keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 6:01:47 PM
>> > > > >> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] travis seems to be down
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Seems like they are fully operational[1]. I believe that this is
>> the
>> > > > >> reason:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> "No output has been received in the last 10 minutes, this
>> potentially
>> > > indicates a stalled build or something wrong with the build itself."
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Based on my previous experiences, it happens when the build
>> takes too
>> > > > >> long. Not really sure if that's the root cause, but I can help
>> > > > >> investigating it.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> [1] - https://www.traviscistatus.com/
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> On 2016-07-27, Bill Burke wrote:
>> > > > >>> A lot of builds failing in initial setup
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Bill
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> _______________________________________________
>> > > > >>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> > > > >>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> > > > >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>> > > > >> --
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> abstractj
>> > > > >> PGP: 0x84DC9914
>> > > > >> _______________________________________________
>> > > > >> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> > > > >> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> > > > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>> > > > > --
>> > > > >
>> > > > > abstractj
>> > > > > PGP: 0x84DC9914
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > >
>> > > abstractj
>> > > PGP: 0x84DC9914
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > keycloak-dev mailing list
>> > > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>> > >
>>
>> --
>>
>> abstractj
>> PGP: 0x84DC9914
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing listkeycloak-dev at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/attachments/20160823/0314f8ab/attachment-0001.html 