[keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js

Stian Thorgersen stian at redhat.com
Fri Aug 1 04:38:24 EDT 2014 


----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joshua Bellamy-Henn" <josh at psidox.com>
> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Josh" <smysnk at gmail.com>, keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thursday, 31 July, 2014 7:10:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
> 
> I never heard back :P

Sorry about that, been a few hectic weeks at camp Keycloak ;)

> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Joshua Bellamy-Henn <josh at psidox.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Woot, okay.. just making sure it's working.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian at redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I re-registered it after that though
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: "Joshua Bellamy-Henn" <josh at psidox.com>
> >> > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
> >> > Cc: "Josh" <smysnk at gmail.com>, keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> >> > Sent: Thursday, 31 July, 2014 4:29:49 PM
> >> > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
> >> >
> >> > I went through the deletion process so shouldn't be registered anymore.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian at redhat.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I think you got the 403 due to it already being registered.
> >> > >
> >> > > There should be two versions available 1.0-beta3 and 1.0-beta4-pre.
> >> Once
> >> > > we release 1.0.final it'll be tagged as 1.0. The 1.0-beta3 syntax
> >> should
> >> > > work as jQuery uses it ;)
> >> > >
> >> > > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > > From: "Joshua Bellamy-Henn" <josh at psidox.com>
> >> > > > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
> >> > > > Cc: "Josh" <smysnk at gmail.com>, keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> >> > > > Sent: Wednesday, 30 July, 2014 9:13:21 PM
> >> > > > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
> >> > > >
> >> > > > So I've tried to register this package for you guys using bower:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > ~/play/keycloak-js-bower    master    14:08:22
> >> > > >
> >> > > > $ bower register keycloak git://
> >> > > github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git
> >> > > >
> >> > > > bower keycloak#*               resolve git://
> >> > > > github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git#*
> >> > > >
> >> > > > bower keycloak#*              checkout master
> >> > > >
> >> > > > bower keycloak#*              resolved git://
> >> > > > github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git#923dccb251
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [?] Registering a package will make it installable via the registry
> >> (
> >> > > > https://bower.herokuapp.com), continue? Yes
> >> > > >
> >> > > > bower keycloak                register git://
> >> > > > github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git
> >> > > >
> >> > > > bower                         EUNKNOWN Unknown error: 403
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I am afraid this could be due to the version number possibly being
> >> in an
> >> > > > incorrect format.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Joshua Bellamy-Henn <
> >> josh at psidox.com>
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > I removed the "keycloak" package, the name should be open for
> >> > > registration
> >> > > > > now.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Still bit skeptical it will accept anything other than "x.x.x"
> >> notation
> >> > > > > for versioning but give it a try. :)
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > - Josh
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Stian Thorgersen <
> >> stian at redhat.com>
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >> Have you contacted the Bower guys to get this changed yet?
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> By the way we're going to stick with the same versioning that we
> >> use
> >> > > for
> >> > > > >> Keycloak except we'll remove -final from the final release. So
> >> > > versions
> >> > > > >> would be:
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> 1.0-beta4
> >> > > > >> 1.0-rc1
> >> > > > >> 1.0
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> That should mean that versions such as ">=1.0" will work, and
> >> will
> >> > > only
> >> > > > >> use stable versions, while if someone wants to use a beta or rc
> >> they
> >> > > can
> >> > > > >> explicitly specify the version.
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > > >> > From: "Josh" <smysnk at gmail.com>
> >> > > > >> > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
> >> > > > >> > Cc: keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> >> > > > >> > Sent: Thursday, 3 July, 2014 4:46:09 PM
> >> > > > >> > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > I do think there is a problem using that version format, I
> >> think I
> >> > > > >> tried it
> >> > > > >> > originally and bower was having none of it.  This could be
> >> because
> >> > > they
> >> > > > >> use
> >> > > > >> > version for auto upgrade purposes, where one can use a "~"
> >> > > character to
> >> > > > >> > prefix the version to allow upgrades in version minors in the
> >> > > bower.json
> >> > > > >> > file.
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > eg.
> >> > > > >> >   "dependencies": {
> >> > > > >> >     "keycloak": "~0.3.12"
> >> > > > >> >   },
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > I have to admit I've been pulled to the dark side a little
> >> bit, it
> >> > > do
> >> > > > >> enjoy
> >> > > > >> > npm / bower for doing javascript type build processes
> >> (sometimes a
> >> > > > >> > necessary evil).  I was never a a fan of 'grunt' but found that
> >> > > 'gulp'
> >> > > > >> is
> >> > > > >> > much better.  I have a hybrid build process in my java apps
> >> where I
> >> > > > >> > sometimes break out of maven to execute some gulp build
> >> processes.
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > But I understand for project like keycloak 'npm / gulp' adds a
> >> lot
> >> > > of
> >> > > > >> > complexity to build process and is not desirable.
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > I'll talk to the bower guys to get keycloak switched over to
> >> your
> >> > > fork
> >> > > > >> :D
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Stian Thorgersen <
> >> stian at redhat.com>
> >> > > > >> wrote:
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > > I've pulled in your stuff to
> >> > > > >> https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower
> >> > > > >> > >
> >> > > > >> > > I'd prefer the versions to match with Keycloak versions
> >> > > (1.0-beta-2,
> >> > > > >> > > 1.0-beta-3, 1.0-final). Do you know if that'll be a problem?
> >> > > > >> > >
> >> > > > >> > > Also, I'm going to add minification of keycloak.js to our
> >> Maven
> >> > > build.
> >> > > > >> > > We'll need it there as well + we're mainly Java/Maven guys ;)
> >> > > > >> > >
> >> > > > >> > > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > > >> > > > From: "Josh" <smysnk at gmail.com>
> >> > > > >> > > > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
> >> > > > >> > > > Cc: keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> >> > > > >> > > > Sent: Monday, 23 June, 2014 10:38:44 PM
> >> > > > >> > > > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
> >> > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > >> > > > Looks like it's a manual process at the moment to get
> >> registry
> >> > > > >> moved to a
> >> > > > >> > > > different github endpont.  Let me know when you have the
> >> project
> >> > > > >> setup
> >> > > > >> > > and
> >> > > > >> > > > I'll contact the bower guys.
> >> > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > >> > > > - Josh
> >> > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Josh <smysnk at gmail.com>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > >> > > > > You bet, I actually had the thought that it would be
> >> better as
> >> > > > >> part of
> >> > > > >> > > the
> >> > > > >> > > > > release cycle.  I'll have to figure out how to transfer
> >> bower
> >> > > > >> > > repositories
> >> > > > >> > > > > because there was no login required to register a bower
> >> repo
> >> > > and
> >> > > > >> > > currently
> >> > > > >> > > > > I have taken "keycloak" which would be optimal for the
> >> > > project.
> >> > > > >> > > > >
> >> > > > >> > > > >
> >> > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Stian Thorgersen <
> >> > > > >> stian at redhat.com>
> >> > > > >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >> > > > >
> >> > > > >> > > > >> Hi Josh,
> >> > > > >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> > > > >> That's great - thanks for contributing this. I would
> >> like to
> >> > > > >> transfer
> >> > > > >> > > > >> this to https://github.com/keycloak though, I hope your
> >> > > happy
> >> > > > >> with
> >> > > > >> > > that.
> >> > > > >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> > > > >> Thanks,
> >> > > > >> > > > >> Stian
> >> > > > >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> > > > >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > > >> > > > >> > From: "Josh" <smysnk at gmail.com>
> >> > > > >> > > > >> > To: keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> >> > > > >> > > > >> > Sent: Friday, 20 June, 2014 6:30:02 PM
> >> > > > >> > > > >> > Subject: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
> >> > > > >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > > > >> > Hi guys,
> >> > > > >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > > > >> > I have created a little github project to make
> >> keycloak.js
> >> > > > >> > > available to
> >> > > > >> > > > >> bower
> >> > > > >> > > > >> > package manager .
> >> > > > >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > > > >> > Project here:
> >> > > > >> > > > >> > https://github.com/smysnk/keycloak-adapter-bower
> >> > > > >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > > > >> > Usage:
> >> > > > >> > > > >> > $ bower install keycloak
> >> > > > >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > > > >> > - Josh
> >> > > > >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > > > >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > > > >> > > > >> > keycloak-user mailing list
> >> > > > >> > > > >> > keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> >> > > > >> > > > >> >
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
> >> > > > >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> > > > >
> >> > > > >> > > > >
> >> > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > >> > >
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

More information about the keycloak-user mailing list