[keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js

[Josh]

I do think there is a problem using that version format, I think I tried it
originally and bower was having none of it.  This could be because they use
version for auto upgrade purposes, where one can use a "~" character to
prefix the version to allow upgrades in version minors in the bower.json
file.

eg.
  "dependencies": {
    "keycloak": "~0.3.12"
  },


I have to admit I've been pulled to the dark side a little bit, it do enjoy
npm / bower for doing javascript type build processes (sometimes a
necessary evil).  I was never a a fan of 'grunt' but found that 'gulp' is
much better.  I have a hybrid build process in my java apps where I
sometimes break out of maven to execute some gulp build processes.

But I understand for project like keycloak 'npm / gulp' adds a lot of
complexity to build process and is not desirable.

I'll talk to the bower guys to get keycloak switched over to your fork :D



On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian at redhat.com> wrote:

> I've pulled in your stuff to https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower
>
> I'd prefer the versions to match with Keycloak versions (1.0-beta-2,
> 1.0-beta-3, 1.0-final). Do you know if that'll be a problem?
>
> Also, I'm going to add minification of keycloak.js to our Maven build.
> We'll need it there as well + we're mainly Java/Maven guys ;)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Josh" <smysnk at gmail.com>
> > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
> > Cc: keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> > Sent: Monday, 23 June, 2014 10:38:44 PM
> > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
> >
> > Looks like it's a manual process at the moment to get registry moved to a
> > different github endpont.  Let me know when you have the project setup
> and
> > I'll contact the bower guys.
> >
> > - Josh
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Josh <smysnk at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > You bet, I actually had the thought that it would be better as part of
> the
> > > release cycle.  I'll have to figure out how to transfer bower
> repositories
> > > because there was no login required to register a bower repo and
> currently
> > > I have taken "keycloak" which would be optimal for the project.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian at redhat.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Josh,
> > >>
> > >> That's great - thanks for contributing this. I would like to transfer
> > >> this to https://github.com/keycloak though, I hope your happy with
> that.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Stian
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> > From: "Josh" <smysnk at gmail.com>
> > >> > To: keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> > >> > Sent: Friday, 20 June, 2014 6:30:02 PM
> > >> > Subject: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
> > >> >
> > >> > Hi guys,
> > >> >
> > >> > I have created a little github project to make keycloak.js
> available to
> > >> bower
> > >> > package manager .
> > >> >
> > >> > Project here:
> > >> > https://github.com/smysnk/keycloak-adapter-bower
> > >> >
> > >> > Usage:
> > >> > $ bower install keycloak
> > >> >
> > >> > - Josh
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > keycloak-user mailing list
> > >> > keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> > >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-user/attachments/20140703/ea18cdfe/attachment.html