[keycloak-user] LiveOak integration with Keycloak
Marek Posolda
mposolda at redhat.com
Mon Sep 8 13:50:01 EDT 2014
It's in official LiveOak documentation now
http://liveoak.io/docs/guides/tutorial_keycloak_separate/ .
Marek
On 6.9.2014 18:43, Dean Peterson wrote:
> Perfect, thank you!
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Marek Posolda <mposolda at redhat.com
> <mailto:mposolda at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> I've added some "quick and dirty" instructions on how to use
> separate Keycloak from your Liveoak
> https://github.com/mposolda/mposolda.github.io/blob/master/tmp/Separate-Keycloak.md
> . I will try to properly document somewhere later, until then you
> can use those temporary instructions. You will also need latest
> LiveOak master.
>
> Let me know if it suits your needs or if seeing some issues...
>
> Marek
>
>
> On 2.9.2014 09:37, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>
> To make LiveOak as easy as possible to use we wanted it to
> work out of the box, so we include a ready bootstrapped Keycloak.
>
> It's quite easy to remove the bootstrap Keycloak server and
> use your own. Marek is going to upgrade Keycloak in LiveOak
> soon and he'll add some documentation on how to use an
> external Keycloak server.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Dean Peterson" <peterson.dean at gmail.com
> <mailto:peterson.dean at gmail.com>>
> To: keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, 2 September, 2014 3:50:54 AM
> Subject: [keycloak-user] LiveOak integration with Keycloak
>
> I am wondering about the KeycloakApplication class the
> LiveOak project seems
> to be using to extend Keycloak for their framework. I
> really like what
> LiveOak is doing but I am not able to understand why they
> would couple
> everything to a custom version of Keycloak. I want to have
> a separate
> Keycloak server that handles security for whatever
> applications I have. It
> seems their decision to include Keycloak in the deployment
> of LiveOak
> prevents me from deploying multiple LiveOak domain models
> on separate
> servers. Every LiveOak will have its own instance of
> Keycloak. I am asking
> here because it seems Stian has had a hand in the creation
> of LiveOak and I
> was hoping he might see this and shed some light on the
> subject. There is
> little documentation on the KeycloakApplication class. Is
> that used to
> easily extend Keycloak and embed it into other frameworks?
> Doesn't that
> defeat the purpose of Security As A Service? Any ideas how
> I might decouple
> Keycloak from LiveOak?
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing list
> keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing list
> keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-user/attachments/20140908/5d872fa3/attachment.html
More information about the keycloak-user
mailing list