[resteasy-dev] netty / undertow tests in RESTEasy testsuite

Rebecca Searls rsearls at redhat.com
Tue Oct 16 15:18:29 EDT 2018


I understand where you are coming from not wanting to create a new module
just for 1 test
but I also prefer not mixing such unrelated code in with existing modules
just to avoid it.  I think a
new module would be good here.   It makes it very clear these are
different.  It does not mix specifying
jboss-servlet-api_3.1_spec with code that does not require it.  And over
time there may be the need to add more tests for these.   I vote new module.

On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 1:56 PM Ron Sigal <rsigal at redhat.com> wrote:

> For RESTEASY-2041 "Refactor scopes for Servlet API jar" I want to write
> tests that use netty and undertow, but I'm not sure where to put them.
> They clearly don't go in testsuite/integration-tests, and it's not clear
> that they go in testsuite/unit-tests, which doesn't reference
> resteasy-netty, resteasy-netty4, or resteasy-undertow. Seems a little
> crazy to create a new module just for one test.
>
> And they can't go in resteasy-netty, resteasy-netty4, or
> resteasy-undertow, because the point of the tests is to check that each
> of them "exports" jboss-servlet-api_3.1_spec to other modules.
>
> I'm leaning towards testsuite/unit-tests.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> --
> My company's smarter than your company (unless you work for Red Hat)
>
> _______________________________________________
> resteasy-dev mailing list
> resteasy-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/resteasy-dev/attachments/20181016/9ded09cd/attachment.html 


More information about the resteasy-dev mailing list