Disabled/Enabled RW - events propagation - questions

[Lukáš Fryč]

Juro, what exactly do you mean by *change event* is triggered even when
working with disabled +pickList+?

Generally, when widget is disabled, user shouldn't be able to interact it,
that's why it shouldn't produce change events.

I guess an expection is a case where you use `setValue`-like method, when
you change the state externally and want to update component even though
interaction is disabled.

Am I missing something?

~ Lukas


On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Juraj Húska <jhuska at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hello guys, again me.
>
> I am testing +disabled+ option of the +pickList.+
>
> When I set this option to +true+, than it is disabled as expected
> (disabled classes are rendered - user can not interact with it).
>
> However, when I am trying to interact with that +pickList+ with JQuery,
> than it state is changed - I guess this is *expected*, as there is no way
> to avoid it, we can only disable the functionality which is achieved in
> standard way. Right ?
>
> *But,* what is kind of interesting is that *change event* is triggered
> even when working with such disabled +pickList+. Is this correct ? IMHO we
> can check before triggering of such event whether the RW is enabled. The
> question is whether it is needed ? I think it applies to all RWs.
>
> Cheers
> Juro
>
> Posted by forums
> Original post: https://community.jboss.org/message/844601#844601
> _______________________________________________
> richfaces-dev mailing list
> richfaces-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/richfaces-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/richfaces-dev/attachments/20131106/32460634/attachment.html