[rules-dev] Eponymous class confusion?

[Wolfgang Laun]

Is this intentional or just the aftermath of past evolution? I don't see the
point of having two defaults.

org.drools.base.DefaultConsequenceExceptionHandler
org.drools.runtime.rule.impl.DefaultConsequenceExceptionHandler

and, thrown from these:

 org.drools.spi.ConsequenceException
 org.drools.runtime.rule.ConsequenceException

Cheers
-W
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20100908/86e437cb/attachment.html