[rules-dev] git branches origin/<username>

[Wolfgang Laun]

On 14 January 2011 14:25, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com> wrote:

>  But Drools isn't being developed according to some standard Development
> Life Cycle.
>
> Not true, but the development process should be documented more. See
> /README.txt
>

Well... Basically, we agree ;-)


> We have plenty of things already set-up. Most recently we defined they idea
> focusing on "branch day" instead of "release day".
> Feel free to open discussions on any other improvements we should do:
> you're right there's much to do. But 1 at a time please, so people can
> adjust to them.
>

A recent exchange with Edson/IRC has brought up a "howto" for the full
branch - change - push cycle. I'm collecting...


>
> Next thing is the split-up of the build and repositories (if possible).
>

Ah, a consummation. Devoutly to be wish'd!


> After that we'll look into a lieutenant git model per repository, which is
> basically the coordination CM role you speak of :)
>

Great.
-W
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20110114/50634523/attachment.html