[rules-dev] JBRULES-2932: suspicious syntax might be the cause?

[Laird Nelson]

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Edson Tirelli <ed.tirelli at gmail.com> wrote:

>    Anyway, as you know by now, 5.2 is under heavy changes in the parser and
> compiler sides. The particular problem you mentioned was fixed yesterday, so
> no need to open a JIRA. Feel free to test against the latest HEAD if you
> can.


Beautiful; I'll close the bug once I test from the trunk.


>    Stay with us during this painful transition because when all is said and
> done, I believe users will be happy with the new language. At the core of
> the changes is the requirement to have constraints defined as: <field>
> <operator> <value>. This is gone in 5.2. Now you can write constraints as
> any valid boolean expression, no funky business necessary.
>

Oh, interesting.


>    Drools compiler is now running all tests green as of last night
> (although we still have some ignored tests to check) and today I am trying
> to make sure all tests in all core modules run fine.


Great!  Glad to hear it.  Push those SNAPSHOTs.  :-)

Best,
Laird
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20110325/7ab82e70/attachment.html