[rules-dev] Breaking Changes Suggestions

[Wolfgang Laun]

I think you misunderstood the intent of the proposal. It's not that I
propose
a reusable CE element combination which might indeed be a query. I proposed
a parameterized sequence of lexical tokens, aka macro. I trust that you know
C and the C preprocessor: I want a macro, not a function.

-W



On 27 March 2012 19:07, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:

> query can somewhat help for re-usable elements, as per "Add CE
> templates".  You can wrap elements in a query and use that inside a
> rule, remember our queries are reactive if you leave off the ?.
>
> Mark
>
> On 27/03/2012 10:02, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> > I've collected a few things I've been moaning about... They are
> > intended to make DRL programming more convenient, given the current
> > set of the Engine's capabilities, i.e., enhance Drools' usability!
> >
> > AFAIK, none of these proposals would break backward compatibility.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Wolfgang
> >
> >
> > On 27/03/2012, Mark Proctor<mproctor at codehaus.org>  wrote:
> >> I've put up a wiki page to collect thoughts on ideas that would involve
> >> breaking backwards compatability in Drools. It's aimed to produce ideas
> >> for Drools 6.0.
> >>
> >> No suggestion is too silly, think of it as a brainstorming area for
> >> alternative syntaxes and behaviours to what we have now, so knock
> >> yourself out.
> >> https://community.jboss.org/wiki/BreakingChangesSuggestions
> >>
> >> Mark
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rules-dev mailing list
> >> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-dev mailing list
> > rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20120327/d5def7e5/attachment.html