[rules-users] Rules Design Question

[Ronald R. DiFrango]

Is there a Milestone release that I can use now that contains this change?

On 4/11/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What is the timeline for the new release as I might be able to migrate now
> prior to an official rollout of my product/project.
>
> On 4/11/07, Mark Proctor < mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
> >
> >  in trunk you can do:
> > mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty, sumCmAndRnr !=
> > $amt1)
> >
> > So you'll have to wait till you upgrade to drop the eval.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
> >
> > Here is a question though now, I have the following:
> >
> > mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty, $amt2 :
> > sumCmAndRnr)
> > eval($amt1.doubleValue() != $amt2.doubleValue())
> >
> > Is there a way for me to eliminate the eval given that it makes the
> > rules engine sub-optimal?  I guess one strategy is to create two separate
> > classes to house the results, but man that seems messy.
> >
> > On 4/11/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango at gmail.com > wrote:
> > >
> > > Michael,
> > >
> > > I got it working, but using Salience alone.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Ron
> > >
> > > On 4/10/07, Ronald R. DiFrango < ron.difrango at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Michael,
> > > >
> > > > OK, here is my attempt to convert the flow chart I have into words:
> > > >
> > > > Step 1: Sum ObjectA
> > > > Step 2: Sum ObjectB
> > > > Step 3: Sum ObjectC
> > > > Step 4: Perform check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and do something
> > > > if it fails
> > > > Step 5: Perform an additional check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and
> > > > do something if it fails
> > > > Step 6: Perform an additional check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and
> > > > do something if it fails
> > > >
> > > > I literally need it in this order and I was thinking that agenda
> > > > groups along with salience could get me there, but I have never used them
> > > > before.
> > > >
> > > > Does that help?
> > > >
> > > > Ron
> > > >
> > > > On 4/6/07, Michael Rhoden < mrhoden at franklinamerican.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >  Please give a better example or some pseudo code of what you are
> > > > > trying to do.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Michael
> > > > >
> > > > >  ------------------------------
> > > > >    *From:* rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org [mailto:
> > > > > rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Ronald R.
> > > > > DiFrango
> > > > > *Sent:* Friday, April 06, 2007 8:15 AM
> > > > > *To:* Rules Users List
> > > > > *Subject:* [rules-users] Rules Design Question
> > > > >
> > > > >  All,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have a rules design question for the community.  I have 3 lists
> > > > > of different types of objects that I need to sum if a certain attribute is
> > > > > present on each one of them.  Then after the summing has taken place execute
> > > > > other rules based upon the results of the summation.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there a way that I can accomplish this via salience or agenda
> > > > > groups?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > >
> > > > > Ron
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> >
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070411/37246bcb/attachment.html