[rules-users] Rules Design Question

[Mark Proctor]

I'm just finalising M2, doing lots of testing here, I think it may even 
be more stable than 3.0.6 :) Deadline for final is now end of june.

Mark
Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
> Is there a Milestone release that I can use now that contains this change?
>
> On 4/11/07, *Ronald R. DiFrango* <ron.difrango at gmail.com 
> <mailto:ron.difrango at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     What is the timeline for the new release as I might be able to
>     migrate now prior to an official rollout of my product/project.
>
>
>     On 4/11/07, *Mark Proctor* < mproctor at codehaus.org
>     <mailto:mproctor at codehaus.org>> wrote:
>
>         in trunk you can do:
>         mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty,
>         sumCmAndRnr != $amt1)
>
>         So you'll have to wait till you upgrade to drop the eval.
>
>         Mark
>
>         Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
>>         Here is a question though now, I have the following:
>>
>>         mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty, $amt2 :
>>         sumCmAndRnr)
>>         eval($amt1.doubleValue() != $amt2.doubleValue())
>>
>>         Is there a way for me to eliminate the eval given that it
>>         makes the rules engine sub-optimal?  I guess one strategy is
>>         to create two separate classes to house the results, but man
>>         that seems messy.
>>
>>         On 4/11/07, *Ronald R. DiFrango* <ron.difrango at gmail.com
>>         <mailto:ron.difrango at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>             Michael,
>>
>>             I got it working, but using Salience alone.
>>
>>             Thanks!
>>
>>             Ron
>>
>>
>>             On 4/10/07, *Ronald R. DiFrango * <
>>             ron.difrango at gmail.com <mailto:ron.difrango at gmail.com>>
>>             wrote:
>>
>>                 Michael,
>>
>>                 OK, here is my attempt to convert the flow chart I
>>                 have into words:
>>
>>                 Step 1: Sum ObjectA
>>                 Step 2: Sum ObjectB
>>                 Step 3: Sum ObjectC
>>                 Step 4: Perform check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and
>>                 do something if it fails
>>                 Step 5: Perform an additional check on sum's from
>>                 Steps 1,2 & 3 and do something if it fails
>>                 Step 6: Perform an additional check on sum's from
>>                 Steps 1,2 & 3 and do something if it fails
>>
>>                 I literally need it in this order and I was thinking
>>                 that agenda groups along with salience could get me
>>                 there, but I have never used them before.
>>
>>                 Does that help?
>>
>>                 Ron
>>
>>
>>                 On 4/6/07, *Michael Rhoden* <
>>                 mrhoden at franklinamerican.com
>>                 <mailto:mrhoden at franklinamerican.com>> wrote:
>>
>>                     Please give a better example or some pseudo code
>>                     of what you are trying to do.
>>                      
>>                     -Michael
>>
>>                     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>                        *From:* rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org
>>                     <mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org>
>>                     [mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org
>>                     <mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org>] *On
>>                     Behalf Of *Ronald R. DiFrango
>>                     *Sent:* Friday, April 06, 2007 8:15 AM
>>                     *To:* Rules Users List
>>                     *Subject:* [rules-users] Rules Design Question
>>
>>                     All,
>>
>>                     I have a rules design question for the
>>                     community.  I have 3 lists of different types of
>>                     objects that I need to sum if a certain attribute
>>                     is present on each one of them.  Then after the
>>                     summing has taken place execute other rules based
>>                     upon the results of the summation.
>>
>>                     Is there a way that I can accomplish this via
>>                     salience or agenda groups?
>>
>>                     Thanks in advance,
>>
>>                     Ron
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         rules-users mailing list
>>
>>
>>         rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>          <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users>
>>           
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         rules-users mailing list
>         rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070411/992a0e34/attachment.html