[rules-users] Creating a long literal

[Michael Neale]

hmmm.. in an eval it *should* work - I assume there is a compile error that
mentions the L ?

well this should not be a problem in 3.2, but for 3.0.x we can certainly
look at it if you have a unit test.

A literal outside of an eval shouldn't be needed - as the type is inferenced
from the facts automatically.

On 2/3/07, Aziz Boxwala <boxwala at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Is there a way to create a long literal in a rule condition?
>
> Typing 30L results in a syntax error because of the L at the end. The
> error occurs even if I put this literal in eval.
>
> --Aziz
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070204/13b15fe0/attachment.html