[rules-users] firing specific rule

[Manukyan, Sergey]

Manukyan, Sergey wrote: 

By the way, I see value of the AgendaFilter to be eliminated and use
instead Predicate interface from apache commons collections:
 
http://commons.apache.org/collections/apidocs/org/apache/commons/collect
ions/Predicate.html
 
as the API that supports Predicate logic is pretty rich and afford
creation of complex predicates using PredicateUtils :
 
http://commons.apache.org/collections/apidocs/org/apache/commons/collect
ions/PredicateUtils.html
 
just my 2 cents ;)
  

People don't like dependencies, you can easily implement AgendaFilter
using commons Predicate - would make a good article for an aspiring user
:)
                        

                        Good point. It just is a bit confusing at first.
How about renaming it from AgendaFilter to ActivationFilter, as it
actually deals with Activations, not Agendas...?

 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Scott Reed
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 12:57 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] firing specific rule
 
Mark Proctor's message received 10/18/2007 12:07 PM:
  

	Manukyan, Sergey wrote:
	    

		Kris,
		 
		 
		 
		It looks like whatever name I choose for
*RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter
		      

- 
  

		*it doesn't fire any rules. It may be the name of my
rule I want to 
		fire or some bogus name, just the fact that I am using
it - make all 
		rules not fire.
		 
		 
		 
		By the way the *RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter("rule name")
-  *makes
		      

sure 
  

		that "*rule name*" - is NOT fired? Or makes sure it IS
fired?
		 
		      

	Read the docs and if you still aren't sure try it. Beats sitting
and 
	waiting on here for an answer :)
	    

 
I know the documentation is not clear. I think it would be helpful to
fix this so it's clear which 
way the filtering works, either by documenting it clearly or by changing
the method name?
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
 
**********************
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**********************
 
This E-mail message and any attachments may contain 
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary 
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of 
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution 
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this message in 
error, please immediately notify the sender and 
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
 
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
 
  

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20071019/ee8d4c59/attachment.html