[rules-users] Re: JUnit and classpath

J Michael Dean mdean77 at comcast.net
Thu Jan 3 09:40:25 EST 2008 

I noticed the absence of asm and tried to manually add version 3.1 and  
this had no effect on the trace.

The MinimalDrools plugin is just my plugin to contain what I thought  
was the minimal amount of Drools stuff;  I have the exact same error  
when I put everything that is in the Drools distribution in the  
classpath.

- Mike

On Jan 2, 2008, at 10:00 AM, rules-users-request at lists.jboss.org wrote:

>
>
>  Mike,
>
>  So it seems you are missing the ASM jar in your classpath... did  
> you tried
> adding it?
>  BTW, what is this MinimalDroolCore_1.0.0.jar that you are adding to  
> your
> classpath? Drools also includes an inlined ASM version inside it for  
> its own
> use... are you stripping that?
>
>  []s
>  Edson
>
> 2008/1/2, J Michael Dean <mdean77 at comcast.net>:
>>
>> Thanks.  When I do that, there is no reference to org.objectweb.asm,
>> nor is there even any reference to any asm library. The information  
>> is
>> about 800 lines long and it clearly shows classes loading from my
>> "minimal core Drools" plugin;  when I add the entire Drools
>> distribution to the classpath I get a similar dump with loading from
>> the complete Drools distribution.  I am attaching a text file with
>> this information but I am guessing it will get stripped away by the
>> server.  I very much appreciate your help with this.
>>
>> I
>>
>> On Jan 2, 2008, at 5:04 AM, rules-users-request at lists.jboss.org  
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Message: 8
>>> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:00:46 -0200
>>> From: "Edson Tirelli" <tirelli at post.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Re: rules-users Digest, Vol 13, Issue 48
>>> To: "Rules Users List" <rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>> Message-ID:
>>>      <e6dd5ba30801020400h2f0a16eyec3ba476c1b36f66 at mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>
>>>  Mike,
>>>
>>>  I don't remember right now the exact flag to dump classpath, but
>>> adding
>>> "-verbose:class" as a VM parameter on your launch configuration
>>> shall do the
>>> trick. Just look for "org.objectweb.asm" package's Classes being
>>> loaded and
>>> you will know where they are being loaded from. You will easily be
>>> able to
>>> see if there is any other asm library clashing with the mvel
>>> required ones.
>>>
>>>  []s
>>>  Edson
>>>
>>> 2007/12/31, J Michael Dean <mdean77 at comcast.net>:
>>>>
>>>> Sorry - am using Eclipse in OSX and have no clue how to ask it to
>>>> dump its
>>>> classpath.I can print out the .classpath file but this is clearly  
>>>> not
>>>> really relevant.
>>>>
>>>> Mike,
>>>>
>>>> This looks like a classpath problem indeed. Did you tried asking
>>>> the JVM
>>>> to dump its classpath so that you can know for sure what jars are
>>>> included
>>>> and if any of them embeds a non-compatible ASM version ?
>>>>
>>>> []s
>>>> Edson
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
>  Edson Tirelli
>  JBoss Drools Core Development
>  Office: +55 11 3529-6000
>  Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
>  JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20080102/8c1cf96a/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:08:28 +0000
> From: Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org>
> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Re: JUnit and classpath
> To: Rules Users List <rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> Message-ID: <477B9ADC.9000908 at codehaus.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> It gets  a null pointer and says it can't use ASM in MVEL, thus uses
> reflection mode. That's fine as reflection is the mode we put MVEL in
> anyway.
>
> Mark
>
> J Michael Dean wrote:
>> Thanks.  When I do that, there is no reference to org.objectweb.asm,
>> nor is there even any reference to any asm library. The information  
>> is
>> about 800 lines long and it clearly shows classes loading from my
>> "minimal core Drools" plugin;  when I add the entire Drools
>> distribution to the classpath I get a similar dump with loading from
>> the complete Drools distribution.  I am attaching a text file with
>> this information but I am guessing it will get stripped away by the
>> server.  I very much appreciate your help with this.
>>
>> I
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 2, 2008, at 5:04 AM, rules-users-request at lists.jboss.org  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Message: 8 Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:00:46 -0200 From: "Edson  
>>> Tirelli"
>>> <tirelli at post.com> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Re: rules-users  
>>> Digest,
>>> Vol 13, Issue 48 To: "Rules Users List" <rules- 
>>> users at lists.jboss.org>
>>> Message-ID:
>>>    <e6dd5ba30801020400h2f0a16eyec3ba476c1b36f66 at mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"   Mike,   I don't
>>> remember right now the exact flag to dump classpath, but adding
>>> "-verbose:class" as a VM parameter on your launch configuration  
>>> shall
>>> do the trick. Just look for "org.objectweb.asm" package's Classes
>>> being loaded and you will know where they are being loaded from. You
>>> will easily be able to see if there is any other asm library  
>>> clashing
>>> with the mvel required ones.   []s   Edson 2007/12/31, J Michael  
>>> Dean
>>> <mdean77 at comcast.net>:
>>>> Sorry - am using Eclipse in OSX and have no clue how to ask it to
>>>> dump its classpath.I can print out the .classpath file but this is
>>>> clearly not really relevant.  Mike,  This looks like a classpath
>>>> problem indeed. Did you tried asking the JVM to dump its classpath
>>>> so that you can know for sure what jars are included and if any of
>>>> them embeds a non-compatible ASM version ?  []s  Edson
>>>> _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing
>>>> list rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20080102/3de471cc/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 07:28:07 -0800 (PST)
> From: ekke <ekkehard at gentz-software.de>
> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Flow of rules ?
> To: rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> Message-ID: <14580184.post at talk.nabble.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> hi barath,
>
> both rules are valid, so both rules will be fired.
> the Rules engine decides which to run first.
> you have to use salience if you prefer one rule running first
> or you have to use a RuleFlow.
>
> ekke
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Flow-of-rules---tp14573971p14580184.html
> Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
> End of rules-users Digest, Vol 14, Issue 4
> ******************************************

More information about the rules-users mailing list