[rules-users] JPA persistence for Drools Flow

[Marc Dzaebel]

Kris Verlaenen wrote:
> 
> Note that the model of the history information is different from the
> runtime model, and contains all the nodes that were triggered (and
> possibly completed). So new data gets added to this process instance log
> every time something new happens, there's no different versions there.
> 
If node states, process variables or the WM change (events), there should be
new rows in some history tables (which I call versions), even if
process/node refs won't change. However, I'm looking forward to your new
persistence option in the trunc.
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JPA-persistence-for-Drools-Flow-tp22918819p22961161.html
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.