[rules-users] is this kind of App right for DROOLS?

[Learning BRMS]

Uaw.. very nice example, Greg... Thanks

I really like these Drools solution. 
I will try your example with some more heavy class (with 40 attributes)
and expand the volume to 2.6 mi objects coming from a hibernate
session.. 

I'll let you know.... I think I will enjoy those tests :-D

Thanks again

Kris

On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 23:01 -0700, Greg Barton wrote:
> Yes, drools can handle this, and can handle the volume.  You may want to consider sequential mode execution, though.  See attached code for some simple matching rules.  In the example there's a 5% chance a transaction with a given id will not be present.  You could mock this up further to have rules to handle matching in the case a simple match isn't possible.
> 
> --- On Tue, 4/14/09, Learning BRMS <rulerhawk at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Learning BRMS <rulerhawk at gmail.com>
> > Subject: [rules-users] is this kind of App right for DROOLS?
> > To: rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2009, 10:43 PM
> > Hi people...
> > 
> > I need to solve a problem on my work and I would hear from
> > you if Drools
> > could help us... 
> > 
> > I have two kinds of "connected by flatfile"
> > systems that register our
> > products selling transactions. 
> > 
> > We need to match dayly every selling transaction against
> > both systems
> > and to track any difference for every store. 
> > 
> > An transaction could happens on system A and not and system
> > B and
> > vice-versa and on different dates or times (connection
> > problems could
> > delay the synchronizing). 
> > The transaction mostly have the same ID, but there are
> > manual
> > transactions too with no id only date and values... 
> > 
> > For each situation I have to fire a different action
> > resolution (today
> > we have humanhand resolution).
> > 
> > We should have an 1 million of transactions by day to
> > process... 
> > 
> > Today we are using a sql script to do reports that will be
> > humanly
> > analyzed... 
> > 
> > I want to change this picture as soon as possible...
> > 
> > Could Drools help us with this kind of analyze, and support
> > this volume
> > of objects? 
> > 
> > How many objects could we have on working memory at same
> > time for that
> > match?
> > 
> > Thanks a lot for any comments
> > 
> > Kris
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> 
> 
>       
> _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users at lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users