[rules-users] ascendant compatibility drools 4.0 <-> drools 2.0 ?

Gab Aldien aldian.gp at gmail.com
Fri Apr 24 06:14:19 EDT 2009


Hi everybody

Short presentation since this is my first time posting there. I am a french
engineering student at the end of his studies, and I am currently working as
a trainee on a project where I have to make a lot of software working
together. I am currently studying a way to correlate alarms sent by a lot of
equipements from a network (type NMS), using openOSS' correlation module,
which was using drools 2.0 beta 2.1


But since it seems the current stable version is drools 4.0, I am thinkint
about using it instead. But if I do so, I will have to bother about
ascendant compability. The programm from openOSS is using drools through
JSR94 interface. Do you think there will be any problem? Where can I find a
good page relating major changes in drools since drools 2.0?

Other question: my project is really ambitious, and I plan to use rules
which will adapt to the topology of the network. Depending on what is
possible in drools, I am thinking about creating a program which will use a
file containing static rules and another one containing the topology of the
network to remotely generate new rules each time I change the network
topology. But maybe this dynamic rule generation is already available in
drools? What do you think?

Thank you very much

Aldian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20090424/6cc1df1b/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-users mailing list