[rules-users] Re: drools-solver - magic name of scoreCalculator
Greg Barton
greg_barton at yahoo.com
Fri Feb 13 12:50:01 EST 2009
Actually, I was wishing for something similar last night, but for the names of entry-points. I think it would be nice if you could specify the names of things in DRL from the values of public static final Strings. (i.e. constants) Do you dev folk think that's possible enough to make a jira request for it?
--- On Fri, 2/13/09, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com>
> Subject: [rules-users] Re: drools-solver - magic name of scoreCalculator
> To: rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> Date: Friday, February 13, 2009, 9:37 AM
> Yes, it's not that good that it's a magic name.
> However, I don't know any other way to do it.
> Feel free to make a jira for it, especially if you know a
> better way to do it :)
>
> With kind regards,
> Geoffrey De Smet
>
>
> Andrew Waterman schreef:
> > Thanks Geoffrey! I patched this yesterday with
> slf4j-jcl and slf4j-nop for no loging. I'll post the
> mavne dependencies later this morning in case others wish to
> use non-log4j implementations. :) I did noticeas well that
> the "scoreCalculator" global is referenced by name
> from the solver. Want me to file a jira issue on that? It
> seems strange that the variable name shoudl be static like
> that to me.
> >
> > best wishes,
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Geoffrey De Smet
> <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com
> <mailto:ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Adding the slf4j-log4j12 dependency to your
> pom.xml should fix it :)
> >
> > <dependency>
> >
> <groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
> >
> <artifactId>slf4j-log4j12</artifactId>
> > <scope>runtime</scope>
> > </dependency>
> >
> > Not sure how changing anything in
> drools-solver-examples could fix
> > it, normally your project wouldn't depend on
> it, only on
> > drools-solver-core.
> >
> >
> > With kind regards,
> > Geoffrey De Smet
> >
> >
> > Greg Barton schreef:
> >
> > I was getting the error below running the
> benchmarkNQueens.sh
> > script in drools-solver-examples. I got
> around it by taking the
> > "<scope>runtime</scope>"
> line out of the slf4j-log4j12
> > dependency in drools-solver-examples/pom.xml.
> Not sure if
> > that's the right way to get around it, but
> it worked. :)
> >
> > --- On Fri, 2/13/09, Geoffrey De Smet
> <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com
> > <mailto:ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> >
> > From: Geoffrey De Smet
> <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com
> > <mailto:ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com>>
> > Subject: [rules-users] Re: drools-solver
> -- logger error
> > (slf4j binding)?
> > To: rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> > Date: Friday, February 13, 2009, 1:04 AM
> > drools-score (like hibernate and many
> other lib projects)
> > just depends on sl4j-api, which is a
> logging interface.
> > It's up to the end-use product to
> decide which logging
> > implementation to use under that and how
> to configure the
> > logging (where to log to, how much to log,
> ...).
> >
> > In the drools solver examples I 've
> put slf4j-log4j
> > underneat it, because I am familiar with
> log4j's
> > configuration, take a look at their
> log4j.xml files. However
> > they say that the logback implementation
> is better these
> > days.
> >
> >
> > PS: I 'll take a look at the other
> discussions this
> > afternoon.
> >
> > With kind regards,
> > Geoffrey De Smet
> >
> > Andrew Waterman schreef:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using the drools-solver.M5
> build through Maven
> >
> > and have gotten the following error while
> running my
> > project:
> >
> > SLF4J: Failed to load class
> >
> >
> "org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder".
> >
> > SLF4J: See
> >
> >
> http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#StaticLoggerBinder for
> > further details.
> >
> > I've checked my dependency graph,
> and
> >
> > drools-solver references the sl4j-api, but
> no
> > implementation. I checked the
> mvnrepository, and there are
> > several other slf4j related projects.
> What is the preferred
> > binding for JDK1.6?
> >
> > best wishes,
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Andrew Waterman
> > San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas,
> Mexico
> > +52 1 967 107 5902
> > +1 510 342 5693
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> >
> <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> >
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> >
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> >
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> >
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -- +1 510 342 5693
> >
> > PO Box 7775 #8750
> > San Francisco, California 94120-7775
> >
> > "Warning: following standard input indefinitely
> is ineffective"
> > - /bin/tail error message
> >
> > "Against logic there is no armor like
> ignorance."
> > - Laurence J. Pete
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
More information about the rules-users
mailing list