[rules-users] Argument truncation in decision table
Jaroslaw Kijanowski
kijanowski at gmail.com
Sat Oct 3 12:00:13 EDT 2009
Hi,
can you attach your spreadsheet? I had no issue to use a function that
takes 8 args (same type and order as in your example) in a decision table.
Could be some typo.
Cheers,
Jarek
Robert Morse wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a Seam (2.2.0.GA) application running under JBoss 5.1.0.GA.
> This release of Seam uses the Drools 5.0.1.GA build. I'm implementing
> a Decision Table for the first time and importing it into Guvnor (also
> from the same distribution). One of the consequences of several
> rules is to call a method that had eight arguments: (String, String,
> Boolean, Boolean, Integer, String, String, String). When I attempted
> to compile the rule set, the method was truncated after the fifth
> (Integer) argument which obviously caused some compile issues. My
> work around was to break this single method in to two methods, and it
> works just fine.
>
> The original method worked just fine when used in a DRL. Don't know
> if there's a limit to function arguments within Decision Tables or if
> this might be a bug.
>
> -robert.
>
> The human mind is an iterative processor, it never does anything right
> the first time. What it does well is to make improvements on every
> iteration (deMarco)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
More information about the rules-users
mailing list