[rules-users] Resuming the Flow: SESSION_ID, PROCESS_INSTANCE_ID, WORKITEM_ID

[Mauricio Salatino]

Yes, creating a new WorkItem to handle those correlations is a good place to
start.

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Ed Staub <estaub at telcordia.com> wrote:

>
> Salatino,
>
> Thanks for your responses.
>
> I don't see what's relevant in WSHT - but I wasn't very clear about the
> problem I'm trying to solve.
>
> We expect to be using Flow to glue together a lot of existing systems, with
> existing async API's, largely transported over JMS.  They don't have a
> place
> to hold onto a Drools-provided correlation ID - they have ad hoc
> correlation
> ids constructable from common data in the request and response.  We will
> need to map from these ad hoc ids to the workitem.
>
> >> Cool, are you planning to implement your own work Item?
> I haven't worked out where/how to wire this in yet.
> I was hoping someone might point me to this being "on the shelf" somewhere!
>
> -Ed
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n3.nabble.com/Resuming-the-Flow-SESSION-ID-PROCESS-INSTANCE-ID-WORKITEM-ID-tp607507p693778.html
> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>



-- 
- http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100402/1e5f2f78/attachment.html