[rules-users] Resuming the Flow: SESSION_ID, PROCESS_INSTANCE_ID, WORKITEM_ID

[Mauricio Salatino]

By the way,
Wait States are Node Instances, that are currently inside the
ProcessInstance. Right?

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Mauricio Salatino <salaboy at gmail.com> wrote:

> Did you see the new BPMN2 spec?
> There is now such thing as a Generic Wait State.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 6:26 PM, tolitius <webakaunt at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Mauricio,
>>
>>    getThePersonAndTheDocumentThatIWant is a business concern. Specifically
>> it relates to Documents and People
>>
>>    my argument is that API such as:
>>
>>    process.findWorkitemsInWaitState (maybe a bit better worded) is a
>> framework concern, since a WAIT_STATE and a WORK_ITEM are workflow [not
>> necessarily Drools ] DSL. Not business. Do you see what I mean?
>>
>>    I don't see me not following your suggestions, and I appreciate the
>> discussion, I just don't understand why the WAIT_STATE is not a framework
>> concern.
>>
>> /Anatoly
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://n3.nabble.com/Resuming-the-Flow-SESSION-ID-PROCESS-INSTANCE-ID-WORKITEM-ID-tp607507p693855.html
>> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> - http://salaboy.wordpress.com
> - http://www.jbug.com.ar
> - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
>



-- 
- http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100402/2b0b5014/attachment.html