[rules-users] Resuming the Flow: SESSION_ID, PROCESS_INSTANCE_ID, WORKITEM_ID

[Mauricio Salatino]

We are agree on that?

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Mauricio Salatino <salaboy at gmail.com> wrote:

> By the way,
> Wait States are Node Instances, that are currently inside the
> ProcessInstance. Right?
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Mauricio Salatino <salaboy at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Did you see the new BPMN2 spec?
>> There is now such thing as a Generic Wait State.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 6:26 PM, tolitius <webakaunt at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Mauricio,
>>>
>>>    getThePersonAndTheDocumentThatIWant is a business concern.
>>> Specifically
>>> it relates to Documents and People
>>>
>>>    my argument is that API such as:
>>>
>>>    process.findWorkitemsInWaitState (maybe a bit better worded) is a
>>> framework concern, since a WAIT_STATE and a WORK_ITEM are workflow [not
>>> necessarily Drools ] DSL. Not business. Do you see what I mean?
>>>
>>>    I don't see me not following your suggestions, and I appreciate the
>>> discussion, I just don't understand why the WAIT_STATE is not a framework
>>> concern.
>>>
>>> /Anatoly
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://n3.nabble.com/Resuming-the-Flow-SESSION-ID-PROCESS-INSTANCE-ID-WORKITEM-ID-tp607507p693855.html
>>> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> - http://salaboy.wordpress.com
>> - http://www.jbug.com.ar
>> - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
>>
>
>
>
> --
> - http://salaboy.wordpress.com
> - http://www.jbug.com.ar
> - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
>



-- 
- http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100402/e1ebe15c/attachment.html