[rules-users] Invocation Patterns

[Dieter D'haeyere]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I understood that there would be a merge
between jBPM and Drools Flow and that that merge would be jBPM v5.
Dieter.



On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Kenneth May <klcmay at gmail.com> wrote:

> You are correct, Drools Flow may not be the best choice of technology.
>  I could certainly write what is required in core Java very easily!
>
> However, there are a few reasons why this was my intended approach:
>  1) A large degree of flexibility may be required in the future.  I
> like the concept of being able to change or apply new logic fairly
> easily.
>  2) Out of the box business activity monitorring is appealing
>  3) I'm keen to explore BPM and rules technology in more depth
>  4) The discussion in this (admittedly old) article suggested jBPM may
> be a good fit: http://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossRulesjBPMSQLorJava.
>  My understanding is that Drools Flow is an alternative to jBPM and
> from what I can tell has a far better integration with rules.
>
> That said: I'm not adverse to alternative approaches if what I'm
> planning doesn't sound like a good fit.  What I need to do is
> essentially pretty simple: take a file and process it through several
> steps (with some logic deciding which steps are relevant).
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> Ken
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100803/67816e43/attachment.html