[rules-users] Understanding agenda-group (doesn't work as documented in book or docs)

[Edson Tirelli]

   LOL, by "jeopardize the intention of the developer" you mean  "guess what
the developer wanted to do but didn't know how to model" or more like "teach
the developer how to use a stack"? :)

   Seriously, there is a reason why stacks work like they do and why
agenda-groups are handled as stacks. You can try to use ruleflow-groups
instead of agenda-groups, if you want to coordinate your rules in a more
straight forward (I guess we could say more natural, sequential) way.
Although, even with ruleflow-groups, you need to model them in the correct
order or things will not go as you would like them to.

   Edson


2010/1/21 Pritam <infinity2heaven at gmail.com>

>
> I set
> session.getAgenda().getAgendaGroup("group1").setFocus();
> session.getAgenda().getAgendaGroup("group2").setFocus();
>
> and only group1 rule fires, but when I set
> session.getAgenda().getAgendaGroup("group2").setFocus();
> session.getAgenda().getAgendaGroup("group1").setFocus();
>
> both group1 and group2 rules are fired.
>
> It looks like setfocus internally is adding to the stack "in the order in
> which it is called."
>
> It would be nice to have a addfocus instead that doesn't jeopardize the
> intention of the developer.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n3.nabble.com/Understanding-agenda-group-doesn-t-work-as-documented-in-book-or-docs-tp133386p133424.html
> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>



-- 
 Edson Tirelli
 JBoss Drools Core Development
 JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100121/dfb47c98/attachment.html