[rules-users] Avoiding loops

[Mauricio Salatino]

you can also add an extra property to your facts to check and add condition
to check that property. (like a processed flag)

Greetings


2010/7/13 Leonardo Gomes <leonardo.f.gomes at gmail.com>

> Hi Droolers,
>
> I'm trying to avoid loops and looking at different possibilities (no-loop,
> activation-group, lock-on-active, etc.).
>
> >Scenario I want to avoid:
>
> For example, the initial facts trigger *rule 1*, which inserts new facts
> that will trigger *rule 2*, which will then insert facts that would
> re-trigger *rule 1*.
>
> >Possibilities I tried:
>
> no-loop -> just prevents the re-activation of the same rule
> lock-on-active -> I can't know which rules should have lock-on-active set
> to true, since I don't know what will be the initial facts.
>
> >What I'm trying to achieve:
>
> All rules in my rule set should execute only once. So, a rule inserts new
> facts only rules that haven't executed so far, should be activated.
>
> Is there a way to do that, let's say 'out-of-the-box', with DRL?
>
> Thank you,
> Leo.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>


-- 
 - CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com
 - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
 - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar

 - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100713/f86c1f3e/attachment.html