[rules-users] Question on contains operator with integer

[cwolfinger]

Yes. But the collection I am testing has Integer objects it is the object of
the comparison for containment that is an int primitive.  So my thoughts are
if this would never work unless I use an eval then why does the rules parser
allow the creation of condition that is invalid?
-- 
View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/Question-on-contains-operator-with-integer-tp440559p442221.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.